Join The Talk You are not logged in.  |   Login  |   View Topics  |   Medical Commentator Bios  |  

Health Headlines

New research explains how synapses in the cortex expand with daytime stimulation and shrink with sleep, resetting the brain and preparing it for the next day.
Discovery repairs DNA, could lead to a revolutionary anti-aging drug, and assist NASA in getting their astronauts to Mars.
More than half of family doctors in Canada are still using manual devices, a dated technology that often leads to misdiagnosis.
MORE health and medical news delivered to your email every week:
New study reveals that lactate, a molecule produced during intense exercise, plays a key role in cancer cell formation.
Drinking tea decreases cognitive impairment risk by 50 percent and as much as 86 percent for those genetically at risk of Alzheimer's.
New research reveals that an altered methylation status in the genome may indicate that mortality is increased by up to seven times
Study finds that yoga classes accompanied by home practice lead to a significant reduction in symptoms of depression.
Study finds that older women face a 33 percent higher chance of developing diabetes if taking statins. Risk increases to 51 percent for those on high doses.
Sulforaphane is shown to accelerate the production of brown adipose tissue, inducing augmentation of fat-burning.
Turns out that soft plaque may not actually be more likely to rupture and cause heart attacks than hard calcium deposits in coronary arteries.
Anti-Aging Forum




Page: 1
Amy Stansbury/The Associated Press
04/02/2013 01:58:13 AM PDT

Why lipstick?

In a world where the popular cosmetic product has become ubiquitous, it isn't a question that many people stop and take the time to consider. That is, except for Richard Russell.

”There are a lot of ways that cosmetics could be worn,” Russell said. “Why do we have to make the lips redder? We could be using nose stick and ear shadow.”

Russell, a psychology professor at Gettysburg College, has been thinking about these questions for a long time and now he finally thinks that he has some answers.

Along with Aurélie Porcheron and Emmanuelle Mauger of the Chanel Research and Technology Epidermal and Sensory Research and Investigation Center in France, Russell recently finished a yearlong study analyzing the effects of facial contrast on perceptions of age. In the end he was able to scientifically prove why modern-day make-up is so popular -- it makes women look younger.

For his study, Russell and his team took 300 photos of adult Caucasian females and, using Photoshop, manipulated the images so that the contrast between their lips, eyes, and eyebrows were increased when compared to the rest of their faces. He then asked research participants to look at the original image and the distorted image side-by-side and to determine which image displayed the younger woman. Another group of participants were only given one image, and without knowing if it had been distorted or not, were asked to guess the age of the woman
in the photograph.

”Almost all of the subjects picked the pictures with increased contrast as younger,” Russell said.

Russell and the other researchers used this information to surmise that as an age indicator, facial contrast is about one-third as strong as wrinkles. This is pretty significant, Russell said, to think that most people aren't even aware of facial contrast.

Another surprising thing that Russell found is the impact that darkening or lightening the lips, eyes, and eyebrows have on facial appearance as a whole. As researchers, Russell and his colleagues knew that all they did in Photoshop was change the intensity of the lips, eyes and eyebrows, and yet doing so seemed to change the appearance of the entire face.

”The whole face looked subtly older or younger,” Russell said.

For the cosmetic industry, that is exactly the point.

”The point of why cosmetics are worn the way they are is to make the face appear more youthful,” Russell said.

Other studies have found a strong relationship between how female a woman's face looks and attractiveness, he added. Russell took this concept a step further with one of his earlier studies when he discovered that female faces naturally have a greater contrast between eyes, lips and the face than do male faces. Following this line of logic, dark make-up placed on the eyes and lips makes women look younger and more feminine and therefore, more attractive.

”There is some degree of biological underpinning in the way cosmetics are worn,” Russell said.

But for Russell, the facial contrast studies have more implications than just make-up.

”We treat people differently based on whether they are older or younger than us,” Russell said. “This points out a sign of aging that we hadn't been aware of.”

The study is the first that shows that older faces lose the contrast between their skin, eyes and lips, which has real-world consequences in the ways that individuals perceive others, Russell said.

And of course, it finally answers that pesky lipstick question.

Rate this topic:
1 2 3 4 5
You have submitted a rating for this topic.
Page: 1

Please login to post a reply. Forum is Powered by Sphene Community Tools
DISCLAIMER: The informational material appearing at The World Health Network Forum (“WHN Forum”) is for educational purposes only and is not intended to prevent, diagnose, treat or cure disease or illness. The posts on The World Health Network Forum are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information implied or expressed by or on behalf of The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M), The World Health Network (WHN), or officers, employees, or contracted agents of the aforementioned entities, none of whom make any claims to promote, endorse, suggest, nor recommend any informational material appearing at The WHN Forum. The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M), The World Health Network (WHN), and officers, employees, and contracted agents of the aforementioned entities do not advocate the use of any particular healthcare protocol or therapeutic agent, but The WHN Forum shares such informational material available with the public. The content of posts at The WHN Forum, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original author and are in no way representative of or endorsed by The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M), The World Health Network (WHN), and officers, employees, and contracted agents of the aforementioned entities. The WHN Forum is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that The WHN Forum is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M), The World Health Network (WHN), and officers, employees, and contracted agents of the aforementioned entities be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of The WHN Forum or other documents which are referenced by or linked to The WHN Forum.

Platinum ELITE sponsors
GOLD sponsors
SILVER sponsors
Media Partners