Posted on May 04, 2021, 3 p.m.
We have a for-profit medical system. The positive aspect of our system is that because it is so profitable, it encourages the development of new, patentable, high-tech, often life-saving treatments.
The negative side is that it has little to no interest in treatments that are natural because by definition, natural treatments are not patentable. And because a natural treatment just might decrease the sales of an expensive patentable treatment, our system will often oppose it even when it is shown to be as or more effective than more expensive and dangerous treatments.
This effect of this negative side of our system is clearly seen when it comes to treating viral infections, including Covid-19. A recent study on the effect of ozone therapy on ICU (intensive care units) patients with severe Covid-19 infections dramatically points this out.
The study, just published in International Immunopharmacology, looked at the effect of ozone therapy on a group of 50 men who presented to the hospital with “severe impairment” of their lung function secondary to Covid-19 infection. Their average age was 75 years. And these were not your basic healthy specimens. Only 4% did not have any significant other diseases – 24% were obese, 36% were obese and on medication for high blood pressure, 32% were obese with type-2 diabetes, 2% had type-2 diabetes, obesity, and high blood pressure, and 2% had chronic lung disease.
All of them presented with ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) and had CT confirmed interstitial pneumonia. ARDS and interstitial pneumonia are the primary causes of death in viral infections. Their oxygen levels were so low that every patient required oxygen-assisted ventilation.
The researchers treated them all with standard medical care including steroids, vitamin C, antibiotics, and fluids. But in addition to that, they also treated the patients with ozone therapy. The form of ozone therapy used was the classic form called MAH.
In this treatment, 100-200 ml of their blood was treated with 100-200 ml of ozone (45 mcgm/cc) 3-5 times a day for five consecutive days. The dosage range here goes from 13.5 mg to 45 mg per day. The authors point out that this form of ozone therapy is probably the single safest therapy in all of medicine with a complication of only 0.7 adverse events every 100,000 treatments. Here’s what happened.
Of the 50 patients, all but two lived. That is a survival rate of 96%. Compare that to the published survival rate for all patients in the USA with a diagnosis of ARDS being treated with conventional medicine – 25%. The difference is shocking! But there’s more.
When it comes to the 25% successfully treated with conventional medicine, the time of hospitalization is between 18.69 – 25.57 days. In this study, the patients treated with ozone therapy was almost half that, 11.12 – 15.78 days.
How did all this happen? I have already explained to you in past reports the strong normalization action of ozone therapy on the immune system response. Here’s a summary of the marvelous physiological effects of ozone therapy on these patients:
- CRP (C-reactive protein) a reliable measurement of inflammation response of the immune system was reduced up to 48.15%.
- IL-6 (interleukin-6), another potent marker for inflammation was reduced an incredible 86.17%. Keep in mind that most patients who die from ARDS ultimately succumb to the effects of excessive inflammation.
- As I have explained before, ozone increases both the delivery of oxygen and the utilization of oxygen by the cells. In this study, patients treated with ozone had a remarkable 13.26% increase (from 85% to 98%) in their tissue oxygen levels (SatO2%).
- The ratio of oxygen in the arteries to oxygen being inhaled (PaO2/FiO2) increased 4.5% following the ozone treatments indicating an almost immediate recovery of normal lung function from the ozone treatments.
- Many patients die of ARDS because of inflammatory-induced blood clotting. This can be measured by a blood test called D-dimer. In these patients treated with ozone therapy, there was an average 35% decrease in D-dimer levels.
There were no side effects from the ozone therapy – unless you consider profit. The drug that Dr. Fauci has been recommending for Covid-19 treatment is Remdesivir. It goes for between $3,100 and $5,000 for a treatment course. The cost of MAH is about $10 per treatment. Obviously, there’s a problem there.
Just in case you are interested, here is the unpatentable treatment protocol that I have been successfully using for years with every viral infection I have ever treated. This includes influenza, meningitis, West Nile virus, unidentified viral pneumonitis, hantavirus, and more recently COVID-19. No one has to die of any viral infections:
- I give the patient a single dose of 25 mg of ozone using the MAH method. I do this on 2 consecutive days.
- Between the MAH treatments, I have them nebulize 3cc of a solution of 3% pharmaceutical grade hydrogen peroxide in 100cc normal saline every waking hour. Hydrogen peroxide in this solution kills all viruses on contact. The nebulization procedure is able to directly kill all viruses in the lungs and upper respiratory tract.
- In addition, I also prescribe a zinc acetate lozenge (every 2 hours while awake), vitamin D3 (5,000 units per day), vitamin A (25,000 units per day), and vitamin C (1,000 mg every two hours while awake).
Once again, the only problem with this approach is that it is so inexpensive that it’s not approved of by the CDC, NIH, FDA, or any other governmental agency. You can find doctors trained in how to use these unpatentable methods at the American Academy of Ozonotherapy website (www.aaot.us).
REF: Franzini M, Vakdenassi L, et al. Oxygen-ozone (O 2-O 3) immunoceutical therapy for patients with COVID-19. Preliminary evidence reported. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Aug 8;88:106879.
Quarantines and Lockdowns Are No Longer Needed – Here’s the Proof
Is the misery from the lockdowns and other restrictions worse than the virus? I just watched this excellent presentation on YouTube, which is data-driven and fully referenced, that deals straight on with this question.
Would you be amazed to learn that the data strongly suggests that lockdowns have literally done nothing to mitigate the pandemic? Would you be surprised to learn that the World Health Organization (WHO) as much as said this in October 2019?
The following is a list of some of the more amazing facts and statistics that Ivor Cummins, a biochemical engineer, and complex problem-solving specialist, presents and explains. He does a superb job of laying out the facts – all fully referenced and graphed in respectable journals. Please watch his incredible presentation by searching YouTube for, “Crucial Viral Update Dec 7th – Europe and USA Explained!” The URL is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cjgicrA504. Here’s what you will learn:
- Statistically speaking, every single lockdown in every state and country has failed to result in either a decrease in the COVID death rate or in the COVID “case” rate.
- There are currently 23 published papers on the futility of the lockdowns and 18 papers on the health-related harms of lockdowns. You can access these at: https://thefatemperor.com/published-papers-and-data-on-lockdown-weak-efficacy-and-lockdown-huge-harms/.
- Sweden has never mandated a lockdown. They are way down the list of COVID deaths at #24. The 23 countries with higher death rates all employed lockdowns.
- Florida relaxed all mandates, lockdowns, and restrictions of any kind in September. The result? As of December 5, Florida’s COVID death rate is lower than every other area in the country. When you look at the death rates, “case” rates, and hospitalization rates of the seven most locked down states, Florida is lower in every category!
- As late as October 2019, the WHO posted on its website the recommendations for quarantine. They clearly state that once a viral epidemic has hit the streets and gone public, quarantines and lockdowns are not effective.
- The published COVID-19 death rate has been consistently going down over the past nine months. This has happened while the “case” rate has dramatically gone up. How can that be? There are only three possible explanations. Either one, the people who would ordinarily be dying from cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc. are now incorrectly being labeled as dying from COVID. Or two, since the PCR test as it’s currently being used is prone to a 100% false-positive rate (even Fauci admits this), the death rate from COVID-19 is being significantly overestimated. Or three, we are getting much better at treatment. Most likely, all these factors are playing a role.
- Patients now admitted to the hospital for any reason are only being tested for COVID and not any other viruses. Therefore, it is very likely that many of the patient deaths attributed to COVID-19 are actually dying from other viruses given the fact that there’s such a high false-positive rate on the PCR test.
- COVID-19 has a seasonal flu pattern that is not significantly different from any other flu. It came on strong in the spring, went away for the summer, and has returned in the fall. There is no reason at all to suspect that this COVID epidemic won’t be gone next year just like every other pandemic we have ever had.
Do These CDC Stats Prove a Vaccine Isn’t Necessary?
Here are some interesting facts you can get from the CDC website. The statistical chance of anyone without co-morbid medical conditions like obesity, lung disease, heart disease, cancer, etc. dying from COVID-19 is one in ten thousand.
This means that even if we were sure that we had a 100% effective vaccine for COVID-19, we would have to inject 9,999 people with it to save one life. Given these odds, if a vaccine is to be used to fight COVID-19, doesn’t it make more sense simply to inoculate only those at extra risk? Why inject 9,999 people simply to save one? But we could also ask the same question even in people with a co-morbidity.
The statistical chance of anyone (any age, any condition) dying in the US from COVID-19 is much higher than one in 10,000 because it includes the very old and the very sick. Even then, the chance of dying is only one in a thousand. This means that in order to save the life of one vulnerable individual, we would have to subject 999 people to the potential dangers of an unproven vaccine even though they didn’t need it.
With stats like these, I ask a simple question. Why would a healthy individual want to get injected with a vaccine that uses a technology never before approved for human use, that has no proven efficacy, and has no long-term safety studies?
COVID-19/Flu Treatment and Prevention
- Super Immune QuickStart – one scoop per day
- Vitamin D3 – take enough to get your blood levels over 50ng/ml. Start with 5000 units per day.
- Vitamin K2 – take 15mg per day or 150mcgm of vitamin K (MK-7)
- Vitamin A 25,000 – take 1/week.
- Melatonin 60mg – 1 at bedtime
- Have on hand the following. You can get this from our clinic store:
- A nebulizer, special hydrogen peroxide solution, and zinc acetate lozenges. You can get all these from the clinic. Also, have some vitamin C 1000mg capsules. At the very first signs of a flu, start the following:
- Rest and fluids and 1000mg of vitamin C, 4x/day.
- Put 3cc of the special Hydrogen peroxide solution into the nebulizer and breathe this every waking hour for the first two days. Once it is obvious that you are getting over the infection, you can decrease to 4x/day until you are over the infection.
- Zinc acetate lozenges – take 1 every 2 waking hours until you are over the infection.
- Hydrocortisone 20mg – will have to get this from a doctor. Take 1 every morning.
- If you have an immune deficiency, are on immune suppressive medications, or if you are not much better after two days, consult a doctor who can give you MAH blood ozone therapy followed by 25 grams of IV Vitamin C on 2-3 consecutive days. Continue the above between these IVs. You can find one at www.oxygenhealingtherapies.com.
- Additionally, although the data on the medication Ivermectin is not conclusive, it does kill COVID-19 in culture, and has been used very successfully in clinical trials against COVID infections. It is an anti-parasite drug that has been around for years, it is very safe and relatively inexpensive. The reported dose recommendations are: a single dose of 200 µg/kg $30), with repeat dosing on days 3 and 7 if needed. In one study of hospitalized patients, 13 patients received a second dose. Ninety percent of the ivermectin group and 97% of the usual care group received hydroxychloroquine (the majority received hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with azithromycin). Dr. Kylie Wagstaff, who led the study, said “We found that even a single dose could essentially remove all viral RNA by 48 hours and that even at 24 hours there was a really significant reduction in it.”
Dear Patients and Friends,
Please be familiar with the information below. You will not hear most of this from the media. Feel free to pass the information on to anyone whom you think may not be aware of what I present. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies. I believe we live in a free country, and that anyone who wants an approved vaccine has the right to get it, and anyone who does not want it has the right to refuse it. In order to make that decision, all of us need to have all of the pertinent information regarding the vaccine.
- The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. The current vaccines are not FDA approved. They have been fast-tracked on what is called an EUA (emergency use authorization). This means that although some short-term data is known, no actual data is reliable, and the vaccine is listed as an “investigational drug”. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea how long it will react, or if it will be effective or safe. Because there is evidence that the mRNA vaccines can cause sterility in women by interfering with placenta function via an interaction with the placenta protein sincytin-1, they are not authorized to be given to women who are pregnant or who plan to get pregnant.
- Traditional vaccines simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from embryological and non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that resembles critical proteins (antigens) on the COVID-19 virus. This has been shown to induce antibodies to those COVID proteins. Whether these antibodies are effective or not remains unknown at this time. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
- Normally, the activity of our natural mRNA is controlled by enzymes called RNAases. These enzymes act to inactivate the mRNA once it has made the proteins that the body requires. This is important, because it would be disastrous if there were no turn-off signal. That would result in the mRNA just cranking out proteins without any restraint, and that would compromise the ability of the cell to function. The mRNA vaccine has been engineered to have altered cleavage sites that block the ability of the RNAases from working. This is because the vaccine makers want to have a continuous output of the vaccine-created protein. Thus, there are none of the normal restraints on cellular protein balance that normally occurs. How long the vaccine mRNA will continue to produce these abnormal proteins is completely unknown. It could be 24 hours. It could be 24 months. We just do not know. Additionally, the consequences of foreign mRNA continuously producing foreign protein in our cells without any of the normal restraints are unknown.
- In order to get the mRNA vaccine into each and every one of our cells, it is attached to a virus called adenovirus. This is referred to as a viral vector. The adenovirus enters out cells and brings the vaccine mRNA in with it. Thus, the cells become infected with an adenovirus along with the vaccine mRNA. We are told that the adenoviral infection is harmless.
- The mRNA/adenovirus molecule is vulnerable to destruction by our immune systems. So, in order to protect it while it is being inserted into our cells, it is coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA/adenovirus from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
- So far, I have not been able to access the complete list of ingredients in these vaccines because the manufacturers have not yet released a package insert. However, most vaccines require aluminum, mercury, and occasionally formaldehyde in order to be maximally effective. The manufacturers have not yet made any statements denying that such ingredients are in the COVID-19 vaccines. They may or may not be, I just don’t know for sure yet. As you know, these substances are all toxic to the human body.
- Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as Pathogenic Priming is a side effect of vaccines. As best as I can determine was first described in the 1960s when Big Pharma came up with a vaccine for RSV. RSV is a relatively harmless virus that is rarely fatal, so why they needed a vaccine is beyond me, but that’s what they came up with. In the first human study on 35 children, 10% of them died from ADT. When we are exposed to a virus, we develop immune antibodies to it. These antibodies neutralize the virus so that when it is taken up by immune cells called macrophages, they are able to destroy it. ADT happens when a vaccine produces antibodies that are not capable of fully neutralizing a virus. In that case, when the vaccinated person is exposed to the real virus, it is not adequately neutralized, and when a macrophage takes it up, it is not able to kill it. Instead, of getting killed, the virus is then able to kill the macrophage and continue to replicate. The end result is a quick death to the vaccinated person that would not have occurred if he had been naturally immunized by being exposed to the virus. Viral experts are concerned that the unproven COVID-19 vaccines may well result in ADT and cause more fatalities down the line.
- Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
- Absolutely no long-term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be a guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.
- Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, "I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is a Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. He is a well know vaccine advocator.
- Michal Linial, Ph.D. is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, "I won't be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know." Dr. Linial is also a well-known vaccine advocator.
- In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: "some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects", and that "doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic".
- Pandemics are not defined simply by how many people test positive. They are defined by how many people die. The initial death rate according to the CDC at the height of the epidemic in April was up 40% over normal. Since then death rate dropped to 22.85%% in August, 13.3% in September, September, 7.45% in October, 16.4% in November, and around 20% in December (numbers not all back yet). Therefore, at this point in time since it is obvious that the death rate is steadily declining, one wonders why we need a vaccine at all. This pandemic is already going away, and will be gone on its own in another 6 months without any intervention. This has been true of every other pandemic we have ever seen. The current scary reporting regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false-positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefore 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. You can see the numbers for yourself at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm. All in all, with the numbers we see now, the statistical chance of an American over the age of 70 dying of COVID-19 is one in a thousand. You have to ask yourself the question, is a 1/1000 risk worth getting injected with an unproven and potentially toxic vaccine with no control restraints and with no long-term studies?
- The other reason that a vaccine for COVID-19 may not be needed is that despite the lockdowns, substantial herd immunity (25-35%) has already taken place in the United States. Although the concept of herd immunity has never been proven, I believe that it bears weight. I believe, this is the primary reason for the persistent decline in COVID-19 deaths even before any vaccine was introduced. The other reason that comes to mind is that the virus may very well have changed into a strain that is no longer as deadly.
- Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media and many of the so-called experts they put in front of us. They have all consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since many of them are supported by special interests who are profiting from the government’s response to COVID, they are not anxious to tell you what you are reading here. That is why I am sending this to you. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published references supplied below. Please feel free to check them out.
- I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including their grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine. So far, that has not happened. I, for one, wonder why.
- Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. Since the vaccine is said to work because it induces such antibodies, there is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.
- As of December 20, 2020, the overall non-age-specific chance of dying from COVID-19 was 1/1000. The chance of dying in an auto accident was 1/110. Therefore, if we were really concerned about saving lives, it would be 10 times wiser to lockdown cars than people. Here are your odds of dying from COVID in the next six months (nypost.com)
- Lastly, the latest COVID statistics (January 4, 2021) give is a fatality rating of 1.1 This is almost the same fatality as the common flu. Why? It’s because we are now so much better at treating this virus. So, one has to wonder why it is a good idea to inject unproven, foreign, toxic molecules into their body to prevent an infection that is only slightly more lethal than the common flu. (https://ycharts.com/indicators/california_coronavirus_death_rate)
Here's my personal bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. I believe that would be safer and a more effective way to become immunized. That is after all, how God made us. Additionally, I have treated a number of COVID-positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there aren’t any.
Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD
The Nevada Center of Alternative and Anti-Aging Medicine
About the author: Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD, ABAAM, is licensed in conventional, alternative, and homeopathic medicine. Along with being a board-certified anti-aging specialist, among his many accomplishments, he is an innovator, lecturer, developer, editor, and published author who has developed a method to measure mitochondrial function and oxygen utilization. He is committed to providing the best and latest in biological and medical diagnosis and therapy using an integrative approach for optimal results.
Opinion Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect any policy or position of WorldHealth.net. Any content provided by any author is of their opinion, and are not intended to malign any religion, ethics group, club, organization, company, individual, or anyone or anything.
As with anything you read on the internet, this article should not be construed as medical advice; please talk to your doctor or primary care provider before making any changes to your wellness routine.
Materials provided by:
Content may be edited for style and length